Istanbul's Buried HistoryFollowing on from recent news that the site of modern Istanbul was inhabited by humans at much earlier dates than hitherto suggested, archaeologists are detailing what appear to be very significant finds at Yenikapi, in the guise of cremation urns which date to around 8,000 years ago. This from Hurriyet Daily News...
The urns were found in the everglade at Marmaray, before heavy machinery was due to start excavations. The urns are a first in Anatolian history, which proves human tribes lived in Istanbul before the reigns of Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman Empires.
Experts said the urns were a sensational find and Dr. İsmail Karamut, director of Istanbul Archeology Museums and the head of the excavation, said the digging would continue using hand operated tools from now on. Permission to recommence the use of heavy machinery will be decided at a later date. In ancient times, most funerals were held by simply burying (inhumation) or by burning the body (cremation). After cremation the ashes are usually put in ceramic urns or small stone containers, known as “larnax”.
The age of these discoveries coincides with the recent news, mentioned above, that this particular area was settled by 8,500 years ago, some 6,000 years before previous estimates, and puts old Constantinople in a similar time-frame as 9,000 year-old Çatalhöyük and subsequent settlements of the Late Neolithic that have been documented across Anatolia. As we see from RIA Novosti...
Turkish archaeologists have found artifacts showing that Istanbul, earlier believed to be founded 2,700 years ago by the Greeks as Byzantium, is 8,500 years old, local media said.The Al-Watan newspaper said the excavations in Istanbul, which have gone on for four years, have uncovered four skeletons, as well as wooden and ceramic pieces, shedding new light on the history of the Turkish city.
The discovery was made two months ago at a depth of six meters below sea level at the site of an ancient settlement. Ismail Karamut, who directs Istanbul's Archaeological Museum, said the finding would force historians to rewrite the country's history.
And this report from The National, across in Abu Dhabi, includes a suggestion that Çatalhöyük and these early inhabitants of the Bosphorus may be directly related....
And yet, beneath the water table, underneath the rib cages of hollow merchant ships and broken clay pots, lay the greatest discovery yet. In August, Dr Karamut and his team came across four ancient skeletons buried in graves six metres below sea level. The two adults, aged approximately 35, and two children under two, are thought to have lived during the Neolithic age, around 6,000-6,500 BC.
The objects found with them, particularly ceramic pieces, have led Dr Karamut and his colleagues to conclude there was an ancient settlement in Yenikapi whose inhabitants lived on animal grazing and farming. Researchers have also linked the findings to the remains of an ancient settlement in Çatalhöyük, a Neolithic site in southern Anatolia which was excavated in the 1960s. The similarity between the sites suggests that settlers in the Anatolian planes migrated to Istanbul’s shores some 8,000 years ago.
Taking into consideration the strategic location of Istanbul, it's not too hard to imagine that humans then as now would have likely exploited the relatively easy access between mainland Europe and Asia afforded by the narrow Bosphorus strait, although whether these early findings mark the beginning of a previously unsuspected continuous phase of settlement from Late Neolithic to the present, isn't as yet demonstrated. Back to those burial urns...
The clothes and jewelry of the deceased were put in containers alongside the urn along with other possible items. For instance, if the deceased was killed by an arrow, the arrow would be included as well. The known forms of cremation in Anatolian Archaeology were seen in the early Bronze Age, but this type of burial was uncommon at Neolithic age excavations that date back 8,000 years.
Inside the urns, ashes wrapped in cloth, daily used dishes and the private belongings of the deceased were found. One urn found contained the skeleton of a baby. Experts said it was very likely this area was a burial site. The theory constructed for previous findings, that they may have been moved to this location by movements of a stream bed is no longer viable.
Archaeologists working at the site said after these extremely important findings, the idea of letting heavy machinery operate on the site should be discarded. The crematorium itself may be reached if digging was to continue, according to archaeologists.
Dr. Karamut said the urns were definitely very important findings but added, “It is too early to talk. The dig continues. We will share the results with the public in the upcoming days. I have seen the artifacts at the site. On Monday, we will bring geologists there”. Karamut said after the examinations, the excavation would continue before they had an evaluation.
Associate Professor Necmi Karul, branch chairperson for the Archeologists Community in Istanbul, said, “In Anatolian archaeology, there were no urn burials from the Neolithic Age. It is an extremely sensational find. It is definitely a burial site because they are side by side. They date back to 5800-6000 BC, the last of the Neolithic Age”. Karul also said the head of the excavation should be congratulated for not stopping the diggings.
We can only hope that further work at the site reaps further rewards by imparting more insights into the lives and deaths of ancient farmers, their families and friends, who once dwelt together in a place whose future incarnations would witness both the rise of classical civilisation and the fall from grace of Byzantium, after the siege of Constantinople in 1453.
see also :: Saving Antiquities For Everyone : Archaeological Ethics And The Roman Metro Line 'C'
The National (Abu Dhabi) : Dig Unearths Treasures Of Byzantine Era And Before
PRI's The World :: Istanbul Part II : Sunken Tunnels, Sunken Boats
Yenikapi Museum, Istanbul
Marmaray Project
Çatalhöyük - Press Release 2008 - "Exciting New Discoveries"
image from Der Spiegel :: Digging To Byzantium



6 comments:
OK, Dumb Question #1: was sea level 8,000 years ago at least 6 meters lower than it is today? I knew that sea level rose considerably between 12Kya and 10 Kya, but I thought it had pretty much reached its current level by 8 Kya. Or is there some other factor I'm missing?
Hi Chris, I don't have an exact answer to your question but from reading the linked abstract, levels in the Bosphorous appear to have fluctuated, viz...
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VGS-4MRFC9D-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=9903d91c540ac8e00b18567436d94fac
Title...
Holocene sea level and climate change in the Black Sea: Multiple marine incursions related to freshwater discharge events (2007).
Hope that helps.
Thanks!
I think the situation is that the climate warmed 10 to 12 thousand years ago but sea level rise wasn't instantaneous. The sea had to warm up and expand, ice had to melt etc.
It's not the only part of the world where sea level rise is delayed. The English Channel didn't form until around 8000 years ago and sea level in SE Asia also occurred about then.
Regarding the Bosphorus. I was under the impression that the strong current through it actually makes crossing it quite dificult. Do you know anything about that?
Terry - you're right about the strong currents, as this linked paper seems to suggest - in the narrow parts of the strait, the current is about 4-5 knots, while the narrowest part gets up to 8 knots. The strongest flow is known as Seytan Akintisi, or the Devil's Current
There appears to be a surface current and an undercurrent which would affect shipping too.
Near the northern entrance the current is said to be slowest, lower than 1 knot, so I'd imagine that early attempts to make the crossing would have centred around this point - whether the achaeology supports that, however, I don't know.
see: The Bosphorus - Factors Contributing to Marine Casualties (pdf) by Necmettin Akten (2002)
url: http://www.blackmeditjournal.org/pdf/2002_vol8_no3-4.pdf
Bosphorus was formed about 5600 BCE, so there was no sea level at the mentioned site to speak of during that time. Also the Sea of Marmara was just a small lake.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosporus#Formation_of_the_Bosporus
Post a Comment