The prehistory of the symbolic world as depicted by humans, just took a giant leap backward in time, by a massive 200,000 years, to an era long before the first modern humans were to emerge. This finding, which demonstrates that people were grinding pigments with stone tools 300,000 years bp at Twin Rivers in Zambia, indicates that those who prepared these pigments were doing so on a regular and widespread basis, suggesting that some sort of spoken language was in use at a time supposed by orthodoxy that was far too remote for such advanced behaviour. Here's the entire piece from The Independent...
The use of coloured pigments in early forms of body art may have begun many tens of thousands of years earlier than previously thought, according to a study of artefacts found at an ancient archaeological site in Africa. Scientists working at the Twin Rivers hilltop cave near Lusaka in Zambia have found evidence for the use of colours - possibly for body painting - as early as 300,000 years ago.
This would predate the known use of coloured pigments in cave art by more than 200,000 years and, if confirmed, mark the point when humans began to experiment with paint.
Lawrence Barham, an archaeologist at the University of Liverpool, said an analysis of coloured stains on rock tools found at the site indicated that early humans were grinding ochre pigments long before they were known to be used for cave paintings.
"My work in Zambia is beginning to show that, at least in this one small part of central Africa, the use of mineral pigments or ochres as colours goes back at least 300,000 years," Dr Lawrence said yesterday.
"There is a long period between the appearance of rock art about 32,000 years ago - which is strong evidence of colour symbolism - and this more indirect, ambiguous evidence in the archaeological record of Africa," Dr Barham told the British Association's annual meeting at the University of East Anglia in Norwich.
Archaeologists digging at the Twin Rivers site found ochre pigments of various colours, including red, yellow, brown, black and "sparkling purple", at levels in the ground that correspond to 300,000 years ago - long before the rise of modern man, Homo sapiens.
Dr Barham said the evidence pointed to the use of coloured pigments as part of symbolic rituals by the primitive Stone Age people who lived there. They possibly belonged to Homo heidelbergensis, a species with a relatively large brain.
"If you were to argue that these iron oxides are purely functional, and are of no historic value, how do you explain away the range of colours that are being selected from different places in the landscape?" Dr Barham said.
"If it was just the iron element, any of them would do, whether it was the red or the yellow. Some colours are closer to the site than others so people are deliberately selecting the pigments for the colours, that's how I interpret this," he told the meeting.
Until now, the only unambiguous use of colour in symbolic art is found in our own species in the form of rock art, beads and pigments - such as the famous cave paintings of Lascaux in France.
In Europe the earliest cave art appears no earlier than 40,000 years ago, long after Homo sapiens originated in east Africa about 200,000 years ago, Dr Lawrence said.
"In South Africa, at Blombos Cave, shell beads - some ochre-stained - have been found with engraved blocks of red ochre that suggest colour symbolism existed 75,000 years ago. But that is still less than half the age of Homo sapiens," he said.
It is possible that an interest in the use of coloured pigments for symbolic purposes developed at the same time that early humans made the radical shift from hand-held stone axes to finer stone tools tied to wooden or bone handles. "It may seem a simple development but it is the foundation for all the technologies we use today. It's called composite technologies," Dr Lawrence said.
"I think by that time we have not just language, but the development of quite a complex language, which allows the planning that you see in the artefacts but also the planning to take something out of the environment and to change its meaning by putting it on your body."
It may, however, be difficult to prove unless the art itself was preserved. "We'd love to find a bog body of that age which is covered in tattoos, but that is not going to happen," Dr Lawrence said.
What marks this out as especially significant is the sheer range of colours that were put to use - normally, red ochre is the only colour found in ritual activities, dating from about 100,000 years bp, to the present. The bones of the dead were often stained with red ochre, thought by some to symbolise blood and believed by others to signify a belief in an abstract realm where the spirits of the dead were thought to dwell.
However, in the Twin Rivers site, workers have "found ochre pigments of various colours, including red, yellow, brown, black and "sparkling purple", at levels in the ground that correspond to 300,000 years ago - long before the rise of modern man, Homo sapiens". This startling detail conjures up images of people, living and dying hundreds of thousands of years ago, decorated in a veritable swatch-card of colours, an idea that seems so fantastical as to almost defy belief.
A curious aspect of this is the extremely long gaps in time that appear to have existed from this indirect evidence at 300,000 years, to 100,000 years at Quafzeh, to 75,000 years when modern humans, who by then had existed for nearly 130,000 years, at the Blombos Cave in South Africa are known to have made beads from sea-shells, and coloured them with red ochre. There then follows a gap of another 30,000 years before we see the Ice Age rock art of Eurasia beginning to emerge - raising the question of whether such practices were only taken up intermittently, and independently of each other, without skills being passed down through subsequent generations.
From this it appears that modern humans took a great deal of time to catch up with the symbolic use of colours, pioneered thousands of centuries earlier by species of humans that are largely considered culturally inferior to our own. Thus the implication is that those supposed artistic and spiritual aspects that seemed to define our species as distinct from all others that went before us, were in fact probably inherited from entirely different species of Homo than our own.
This is also something of a blow to those who suppose we modern humans were in some way genetically and benignly altered by some or other alien presence, giving us all the supposed human qualities that would set us apart from our ancestors, enabling us to build what we consider the advanced world in which we currently exist.
Elsewhere in the world at 300,000 years bp, Atapuerca in Spain witnessed the deposition of around 30 bodies of people into a deep pit, comprising the largest collection of fossil humans anywhere in the world. Found among them was a beautiful rose coloured hand-axe, and in the context of the Zambian finds, we can literally add a little colour to the way we view how they might have appeared to us. For the time being however, no-one has a clue as to how so many young adults at Atapuerca came to be buried together in such an unusual manner and location.
And for all we know, these finds might be preceded by yet older sites, populated by even more archaic humans, causing us to question how it was that what many consider to be little more than souped-up apes, suddenly acquired an aptitude and taste for complex spoken language and artifactual decoration. It's my guess we can definitely trace this back to Homo erectus, the longest living and most durable of all humans so far, and who apparently knew how to navigate the open seas at nearly 900,000 years ago - who's to say that these people weren't the first to use language and invent symbolisms of their own, as they set about exploring the world for the first time, travelling from Africa to remote spots like China to the east and Dmanisi, Georgia, to the north.
Expect plenty of raging arguments on this one, as there will doubtless be a bunch of reckless academics seeking to maintain the evolutionary status quo that has remained in place more or less over the last 150 years - the fabulously early dates will be queried, as well as the site itself. But there will also hopefully be further revelatory material published on the subject, which can only be augmented by further treasure troves of prehistoric artifacts at which to marvel.
image: Homo heidelbergensis